Jewish women, or women who happen to be Jewish?
Thirteen years ago today, the newly appointed Secretary of State Madeline Albright went public with the discovery of her Jewish roots. This event brings up an interesting issue, one that we at the Jewish Women's Archive wrestle with daily. Is Madeline Albright a Jewish woman, or a woman who happens to be Jewish? Is there a distinction between the two? Should there be?
In a previous post, Renee Ghert-Zand made this distinction when she wrote: "Musicians like Chana Rothman, Naomi Less and Sarah Aroeste aren’t merely rockers who are Jewish. They’re Jewish rockers." To her, a "Jewish rocker" is one who incorporates Jewish themes into their music, rather than just a musician who happens to be Jewish. This seems to be a legitimate distinction that recognizes the infusion of Jewish identity into one's work. But what of the flip side?
Everytime a famous person dies, I count the hours until the Jewish community finds a way to claim him or her (see: Brittany Murphy). Only today I saw at least four articles on Jewish blogs and newsfeeds wondering if we could claim J.D. Salinger as a Jewish writer since his father was Jewish, but not his mother. Does it make a difference if he is known as a great Jewish author, rather than simply a great author? What does the Jewish community stand to gain from claiming him as one of our own? And if he hasn't incorporated Jewishness into his work, is it really appropriate to call him a Jewish writer? Or is he merely a writer who happens to (maybe) be Jewish?
A great many of the women recognized by JWA in Jewish Women: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia, as well as This Week in History and We Remember are women whose Jewish identity played a large role in shaping their values, work, and accomplishments. At the same time, many of the women recognized do not have strong connections to their Jewish identity and are included because of their Jewish background. (Or are all Jews inherently influenced by their Jewish roots even if they don't identify as Jewish?)
This distinction goes right to the heart of the mission and purpose of the Jewish Women's Archive. At JWA we're in the business of celebrating Jewish women. Since one of our organizational values is inclusivity, we embrace a broad understanding of what it means to be a Jewish woman. Still, we discuss and debate this issue and we do not always reach consensus.
I'm curious to know how you feel about the issue. Should there be a distinction between Jewish women and women who happen to be Jewish? Is there anything to gain from making that distinction?
Double your impact to amplify Jewish women’s stories—
All gifts matched up to $35,000
Before you close this article, please consider supporting the Jewish Women’s Archive and uplifting Jewish women’s voices.
At JWA, we preserve the voices of Jewish women and gender-expansive people past and present, share them freely with millions online, and empower a new generation of Jewish feminists to lead with courage, creativity, and conviction.
But none of this happens without you. JWA is an independent nonprofit— we rely on people, like you, who believe that history belongs to all of us and that the voices of Jewish women must remain powerful, and heard.
This month, a generous JWA board member will match every gift dollar for dollar—up to $35,000—through June 30. Your contribution goes twice as far right now.
Every contribution—no matter the size—helps us document, teach, and inspire through Jewish women’s stories.
It takes less than a minute to make a difference.
Thank you for being a part of the JWA community,

Judith Rosenbaum, CEO

